1973 Citroen Ami vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1973 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1973 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen Ami | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | 3 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 55 L |