1973 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1973 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1973 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen Ami | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | 3 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 55 L |