1973 Citroen Dyane vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1973 Citroen Dyane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 DAF Daffodil (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1973 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 DAF Daffodil should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen Dyane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 76 kg more than 1973 Citroen Dyane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen Dyane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Citroen Dyane | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | Dyane | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 33 L |
