1973 Citroen Dyane vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen Dyane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen Dyane would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 366 more horse power than 1973 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen Dyane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1973 Citroen Dyane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen Dyane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Citroen Dyane | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | Dyane | F-Type |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2390 mm |
