1973 Citroen SM vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1973 Citroen SM is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Citroen SM | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | SM | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 85 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2850 mm |
