1973 Citroen SM vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1973 Citroen SM is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Citroen SM (233 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 1973 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Citroen SM | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Citroen | Riley |
| Model | SM | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2380 mm |
