1973 Citroen SM vs. 1972 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1973 Citroen SM is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1973 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen SM.
Because 1972 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Citroen SM (233 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1973 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Citroen SM | 1972 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | SM | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 350 HP |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 95.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 72.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2420 mm |
