1973 Citroen SM vs. 1999 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 626. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Citroen SM (233 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda 626. (152 Nm). This means 1973 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen SM | 1999 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | SM | 626 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 233 Nm | 152 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2680 mm |