1973 Citroen SM vs. 1999 Rover 25
To start off, 1999 Rover 25 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1999 Rover 25. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 25.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Rover 25 (240 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen SM. (233 Nm). This means 1999 Rover 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen SM | 1999 Rover 25 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | SM | 25 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 233 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 19.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2510 mm |