1973 Citroen SM vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Citroen SM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 581 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen SM. (233 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen SM. 2002 Ford Tonka has automatic transmission and 1973 Citroen SM has manual transmission. 1973 Citroen SM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Tonka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Citroen SM | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | SM | Tonka |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 128 HP |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 6150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 4200 mm |
