1973 Citroen SM vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Citroen SM (233 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (167 Nm). This means 1973 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen SM | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | SM | 6 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 233 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2680 mm |