1973 Citroen SM vs. 2002 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2002 Toyota MR2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota MR2 (197 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1973 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen SM.
Because 2002 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Citroen SM (233 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota MR2. (170 Nm). This means 1973 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen SM | 2002 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | SM | MR2 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 233 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2440 mm |