1973 Citroen SM vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Citroen SM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen SM. (233 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen SM | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | SM | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 233 Nm | 296 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 98.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 86.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2380 mm |