1973 Citroen SM vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (294 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen SM. (233 Nm). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Citroen SM | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | SM | Colt |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 2834 cc |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 294 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2970 mm |
