1973 Citroen SM vs. 2009 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1973 Citroen SM. (171 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen SM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Falcon weights approximately 254 kg more than 1973 Citroen SM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen SM. (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen SM.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Citroen SM 2009 Ford Falcon
Make Citroen Ford
Model SM Falcon
Year Released 1973 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2670 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 171 HP 362 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 533 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 8.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 1704 kg
Vehicle Length 4900 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 25 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]