1973 Citroen SM vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 171 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 72 kg more than 1973 Citroen SM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1973 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen SM | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | SM | E-150 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 62 L |