1973 DAF 66 vs. 1980 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1980 Toyota Cressida is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,972 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Cressida (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Cressida should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 330 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Cressida (162 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 1980 Toyota Cressida will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 DAF 66 | 1980 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | 66 | Cressida |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |
