1973 DAF 66 vs. 2000 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 542 kg more than 1973 DAF 66.
Because 1973 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Avenger (232 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1973 DAF 66 | 2000 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | DAF | Dodge |
Model | 66 | Avenger |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 46 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 75 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 828 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 49 L |