1973 DAF 66 vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Plymouth Neon (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66.
Because 1973 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2000 Plymouth Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1973 DAF 66 | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | DAF | Plymouth |
Model | 66 | Neon |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 46 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2650 mm |