1973 DAF 66 vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (207 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 DAF 66 | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 66 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.1 mm | 87.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 94 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 32 L | 64 L |
