1973 DAF 66 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 83 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 DAF 66 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | 66 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 4698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 32 L | 70 L |
