1973 DAF 66 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 DAF 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (46 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66.
Because 1973 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 DAF 66 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | 66 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 46 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2490 mm |
