1973 DAF 66 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (130 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 645 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (310 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 DAF 66 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 66 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 32 L | 64 L |
