1973 DAF 66 vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66.
Because 1973 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 DAF 66 | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 66 | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2298 cc |
| Horse Power | 46 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
