1973 DAF 66 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (257 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1973 DAF 66 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 66 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 99 Nm | 257 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 32 L | 50 L |