1973 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 758 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1973 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | De Tomaso | Mazda |
Model | Longchamp | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1973 | 1972 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2210 mm |