1973 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (111 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 50 kg more than 2005 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1973 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: