1973 Fiat 132 vs. 2009 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2009 Nissan Murano is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Fiat 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Fiat 132 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Murano (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1973 Fiat 132. (111 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1973 Fiat 132.
Because 1973 Fiat 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Fiat 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Murano (248 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Fiat 132. (147 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Fiat 132. 2009 Nissan Murano has automatic transmission and 1973 Fiat 132 has manual transmission. 1973 Fiat 132 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Murano will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Fiat 132 | 2009 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | 132 | Murano |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 248 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1890 mm |
