1973 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1996 Fiat Siena is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Ford Fairlane (150 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 150 kg more than 1996 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Ford Fairlane (339 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1973 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | Fairlane | Siena |
Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1300 kg |