1973 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II

To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Ford Fairlane (150 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 508 kg more than 1973 Ford Fairlane.

Because 1973 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Ford Fairlane (339 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1973 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Ford Fairlane 2005 Kia Shuma II
Make Ford Kia
Model Fairlane Shuma II
Year Released 1973 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4097 cc 1593 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 150 HP 101 HP
Torque 339 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 1958 kg
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2910 mm