1973 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1973 Ford Fairlane. (150 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1973 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 60 kg more than 1973 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Ford Fairlane (339 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 1973 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Outlander |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |