1973 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Ford Fairlane (150 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 320 kg more than 1973 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1973 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Ford Fairlane (339 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1973 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | Megane |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1770 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2740 mm |
