1973 Ford Fairlane vs. 2013 Aston Martin Rapide
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Rapide is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Rapide is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Rapide weights approximately 540 kg more than 1973 Ford Fairlane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Rapide (601 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Ford Fairlane. (339 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Rapide will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Ford Fairlane | 2013 Aston Martin Rapide | |
Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
Model | Fairlane | Rapide |
Year Released | 1973 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 5935 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 601 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5019 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2140 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2989 mm |