1973 Ford Maverick vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1973 Ford Maverick. (82 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1973 Ford Maverick.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Ford Maverick. (178 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Ford Maverick | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Maverick | XJ6 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2780 cc | 3239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 299 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2880 mm |