1973 Ford Maverick vs. 2005 Toyota RunX

To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RunX (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1973 Ford Maverick. (82 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1973 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Ford Maverick weights approximately 105 kg more than 2005 Toyota RunX.

Because 1973 Ford Maverick is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Ford Maverick. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Ford Maverick (178 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (128 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1973 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.

Compare all specifications: