1973 Ford Maverick vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1973 Ford Maverick. (82 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1973 Ford Maverick.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Ford Maverick. (178 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Ford Maverick | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Maverick | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2780 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
