1973 Holden Belmont vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1973 Holden Belmont. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1973 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Holden Belmont. (228 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Holden Belmont | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | Belmont | XF |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2908 mm |