1973 Holden Belmont vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden Belmont (116 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Holden Belmont weights approximately 288 kg more than 2010 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Holden Belmont | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Belmont | Note |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2600 mm |