1973 Holden Belmont vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz B
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B (136 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1973 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B should accelerate faster than 1973 Holden Belmont.
Because 1973 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B (300 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Holden Belmont. (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Holden Belmont | 2012 Mercedes-Benz B | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Belmont | B |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4359 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1557 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2699 mm |