1973 Holden Monaro vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1973 Holden Monaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden Monaro (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Holden Monaro weights approximately 648 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Holden Monaro | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Monaro | Elan |
Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2240 mm |