1973 Holden UTE vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP) has 166 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Holden UTE | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | UTE | Celeste |
Year Released | 1973 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5047 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |