1973 Holden UTE vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2002 Toyota F-1. (183 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota F-1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Holden UTE. (427 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Holden UTE. 1973 Holden UTE has automatic transmission and 2002 Toyota F-1 has manual transmission. 2002 Toyota F-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Holden UTE will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Holden UTE | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | UTE | F-1 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5047 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |
