1973 Holden UTE vs. 2005 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tazz is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Tazz.
Because 1973 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (103 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Tazz. 1973 Holden UTE has automatic transmission and 2005 Toyota Tazz has manual transmission. 2005 Toyota Tazz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Holden UTE will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Holden UTE | 2005 Toyota Tazz | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | UTE | Tazz |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5047 cc | 1295 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.8 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |