1973 Holden UTE vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS

To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS (288 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1973 Holden UTE. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1973 Holden UTE.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS. (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Holden UTE 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS
Make Holden Mercedes-Benz
Model UTE CLS
Year Released 1973 2009
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5047 cc 3498 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 240 HP 288 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 427 Nm 365 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 77.8 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 12.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 3 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1440 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 80 L