1973 Honda 1300 vs. 1959 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1973 Honda 1300 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Lincoln Continental (349 HP) has 268 more horse power than 1973 Honda 1300. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1328 kg more than 1973 Honda 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Honda 1300 | 1959 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Honda | Lincoln |
| Model | 1300 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1298 cc | 7043 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 349 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 2223 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 3330 mm |
