1973 Honda 1300 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1973 Honda 1300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1973 Honda 1300. (81 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 45 kg more than 1973 Honda 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 1300. (105 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Honda 1300 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1973 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 57 L |