1973 Honda 1300 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 81 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1973 Honda 1300.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 1300. (105 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Honda 1300 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | 1300 | 260 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 2383 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2660 mm |