1973 Honda 1300 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1973 Honda 1300. (81 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 450 kg more than 1973 Honda 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 1300. (105 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Honda 1300 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | 1300 | CU-X |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 80 L |
