1973 Honda 145 vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1973 Honda 145 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1973 Honda 145. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 145.
Because 1963 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Honda 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Honda 145 | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Honda | Plymouth |
Model | 145 | Valiant |
Year Released | 1973 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1433 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |