1973 Honda 145 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1973 Honda 145 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1973 Honda 145. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 20 kg more than 1973 Honda 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 145. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 145.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Honda 145 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | 145 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1973 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1433 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2210 mm |